Quantcast Ledger
College Media Network

The new 'Terminator' could use some salvation

Too many plot holes and bad acting bring down a movie that may have had potential.

Tim Clifford

Issue date: 6/2/09 Section: Arts & Entertainment
  • Print
  • Email
The moment that takes the cake, though, is when the machines identify that they have captured Kyle Reese, could destroy him instantly and end the John Connor problem on the spot, and instead choose to imprison him and extend their devious plan. The only thing that makes this cheesy "Dr. Evil" moment worse is that it happens about halfway through the film. By the way, while I won't spoil it for those who haven't seen it, the ending is so dumb, "Hollywood," and hokey that it might well be a contender for the title of Worst Ending Ever.

An inherent problem with the recent "remakes" and "reboots" of recent is that all of them are attempting to capture the essence of the original films yet modern directors seem to have no idea what made those original films classics. McG has focused all of this film's energy on the crazy machines and the big explosions and has lost sight of great characters. The original "Terminator" and "T2: Judgment Day" were popcorn action films, but they had memorable character relationships. This film has only static characters who spout criminally cheesy tough-guy dialogue ("If your gonna pull that gun out you better know how to pull the trigger") and ultimately never display any genuine relationships. The whole film ends up feeling a bit…um…mechanical and empty.

It's been announced that the DVD to this film will contain about 30 to 40 minutes of cut footage, most notably a topless scene involving Moon Bloodgood that caused a major controversy at studio screenings. Could this film be the next "Blade Runner" -- the director's cut takes precedent over the theatrical release and improves the film? Possibly, but not likely, since a new ending would be required as well as the repair of seriously lagging plot points. McG has made a noble effort to garner credit as a great director despite his cornball name, but unfortunately this is an abysmal failure. With how stale this entry is it may very well be time to "terminate" the Terminator franchise all together.
< prev Page 2 of 2

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 3 of 6

filmguy

filmguy

posted 6/02/09 @ 5:07 PM PST

I'm so tired of critics nit picking every little plot hole in T4 while totally overlooking the dozens from Star Trek. T4 certainly has many problems but I think it's a much better attempt than Star Trek. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Eliza

posted 6/02/09 @ 5:24 PM PST

Jeremy Irons is not in the film. I hated the movie, too, but you should at least get the facts straight. Michael Ironside the one you're thinking of?

Fred

posted 6/03/09 @ 1:39 AM PST

Jeremy Irons?You'review is null and void as you know fuck all about film,you cock...

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What are your plans for the summer?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement